But Moose's 300D results were already showing *considerable* noise.
Maybe you could have sharpened them more but I'm sure I would have liked
it less.
Chuck Norcutt
jjohnso4@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> I would too - all things being equal. But in the Moose test I don't believe
> they were. I can control sharpness to a great extent in software but I don't
> know of any way to increase resolution after the fact.
>
> Later,
> Johnny
>
>
>>>From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>Date: 2006/07/06 Thu PM 04:12:51 CDT
>>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [OM] Re: F30 review, but partly on topic [was Protective Filters]
>>
>>I think I'll take "appears sharper" over "has higher resolution" any
>>time. :-)
>>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|