Always another reason not to. :-)
Seriously, I once thought that full frame was the holy grail with
these things too. But I took the plunge and am very happy with less
than full frame and lenses designed for it. Fortunately for the
decision I made, I had no desire to futz around with manual lenses
that would not meter automatically with an autofocus camera and I
ended up with lenses well matched to the sensor. There is no real
need to hold out for full frame and reduced format cameras have
already become OM size in some cases.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Jul 3, 2006, at 7:27 PM, Mike wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I don't think so. It is hard to think of any area in the 5D that
>> needs to be significantly improved that will make better
>> photographs......
>>
> That may be true or not but one thing for sure can use some
> improvement
> and that is the huge size of the dang things. I'd be way more inclined
> to ditch the OM4 if I could get a full frame digital about the same
> size.
>
> MIke
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|