Bill,
It was indeed a 2.0. While the ad copy said 2.8, it also mentioned the
serial number of the lens that matched the one in the photos of the thing on
the page, so I was relatively sure the pictures matched what she was selling
rather than the auction title.
Re fair prices, what the market will bear. :) 4-5 years ago I paid (as I
recall) about $500-ish for one in near mint condition. Kept it a year and
then sold it for about the same amount.
As time goes on, the OM stuff is going to be harder & harder to find. I've
really seen a HUGE drop in the offerings on eBay from just 5 years ago.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
> All in all, a VERY near disaster. I'm just glad she accepted
> responsibility
> for her mistake and was willing to let me out of the deal.
>
Am I confused! Did she have a 2.0 or a 2.8? And what is a fair price for a
2.0 these days?
Bill Pearce
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|