Let's give credit where credit is due, though. Despite the fact this seller
apparently is not particularly knowledgeable about photo gear, he (or she) at
least in part makes up for it by taking good, sharp photographs of the stuff.
You're unlikely to see a more brutaly honest and revealing shot than this one
of a 24/2 Zuiko clearly showing the filter ring ding and several big, greasy
fingerprints on the front element.
http://pictures.macrosysinc.net/rsw/180618/19406E.jpg
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> IMO . . . only if the price remains low.
>
> Buying from obviously inexperienced/ignorant sellers is always a crap
> shoot. I do it only after subtracting the cost of serious repairs
> from my final offer.
>
> I may be too conservative, but have no interest in buying a pig in a
> poke. Of course, I'd go to Las Vegas for the shows, not the tables.
>
> ScottGee1
>
>
> On 6/25/06, iwert <zuiko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > a 100f2 in the pictures, described as a 100 f2.8
> > might be worth to ask if the pictures are of the item for sale...
> >
> > Could become a bargain,
> >
> > iwert.
> >
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
