Hi Moose,
Nice shots! I'm guessing the 28 - 300 lens was at the long end :-)
I have to persevere more, be more patient, whatever..
I have a 300mm Tamron 2.8 but I lean towards boosting it with extenders.
Your shots are evidence that 300mm is enough and next time out it will be
me, the OM2 SP and the 300mm only. Maybe I can fill the hours waiting for a
decent bird shot with a bit of 300mm landscape photography :-)
--Graham
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 1:50 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: #124
> GeeBee wrote:
>> It's a crow, part of my new policy on bird photography. Long lenses,
>> bigger
>> birds, peferably more tolerant of human presence :-)
> Works for me. Although when you can find one that's happy to pose, you
> don't need such a long lens
> <http://moosemystic.net/Gallery/MPhotos/LobosCrow.htm>.
>
> And sometimes the little ones will pose too
> <http://moosemystic.net/Gallery/MPhotos/LobosSparrow.htm>.
>
> Moose
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|