Subject: | [OM] Re: Like a bad penny, I am back, OT now BBQ |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 4 Jun 2006 15:49:03 +1000 |
Personally I'd prefer professional culling - more controlled control (!) if it is done right. Unfortunately it's usually subject to administrative budgetting. Hmmm. Dingoes were traditionally controlled by professional doggers here - partly to avoid disputes over people shooting each other's working dogs, I suspect. I've always had a problem with those who kill for sport, rather than for food or other necessity. No native mammal can be hunted here without a very specific licence and the duck season has been closed down for the last few years too partly due to the devastating overenthusiasm of a minority who managed to mistake swans, etc. for ducks. Fortunately we've got enough vermin to keep the lunatic fringe occupied - they can go shoot wild pig and each other. That's a reasonable challenge. Nice to see those animals - where's the pix? Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 04/06/2006, at 2:01 PM, James McBride wrote: > Rather than permit > controlled hunting to maintain a reasonable population, California > banned > hunting and are now paying professional hunters to kill more bears > and lions > than hunters ever did. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Like a bad penny, I am back, OT now BBQ, Andrew Fildes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Digital & retro <mostly OT> (also long), Brian Swale |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Like a bad penny, I am back, OT now BBQ, James McBride |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OM]Mute Swans, was Re: Like a bad penny, I am back, OT now BBQ, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |