In the message I received, Moose writes:
>Saso wrote:
>> Well, we've heard these flippant announcements before, pretty much every
>> time a new piece of technology comes out.
>>
>I think flippant is not the right description of Victor or his reviews.
>He is pretty careful and through and always posts lots of samples for
>the reader to judge for themselves.
While I agree that his review is fairly thorough, the conclusions he
draws out of thin air - the shot he uses to compare scanners does not
lend to his story - make him look a part of the flippant reviewer
bandwagon. "Canon EOS D30 better than 35mm film cameras", anyone?
> I'm already pretty sure, however, that it has more than enough
>resolution for the old MF film I want to scan.
Agreed. Epson's 3200 produces scans of good enough quality (3rd party
film holder, multiple passes) for a decent 20x20" from MF film.
> Nothing like scanning old
>shots to make me realize how much improvement film went through the last
>few decades.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|