Le vendredi 05 Mai 2006 14:40, Wayne Harridge a écrit :
> > Another Rodinal fan, I see. Good.
>
> So what happens to Rodinal now that Agfa are out of it ?
>
> > Then I tried PanF. I thought at 50ASA this would be fine
> > grained and nicely detailed. Which it mostly is, except for
> > something like the first below, which has a rather
> > disconcerting absence of detail in some of the faces, and
> > elsewhere. It is underexposed, but I didn't think enough to
> > cause this.
>
> I haven't used much Pan-F but it's all been in Rodinal at the Agfa
> recommended time/temp and I found the same thing - a general lack of shadow
> detail. I guess there are a few possible explanations:
>
> o Pan-F & Rodinal doesn't give the ISO 50 as stated.
> o Agfa have given the wrong development time.
Since I heard about The Masive Dev Chart,
http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html, I've never read an official
timetable again. Never been surprised, never messed a film.
--
Manuel Viet
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|