Just did a comparison using the 4 RAW capable programs I have available
using the same ORF file:
ACDSee Pro - 2624x1966 pix - developed Tiff 30,228 KB
Adobe Bridge - 2560x1920 pix - developed Tiff 28,821 KB
Olympus Viewer - 2560x1920 pix - developed Tiff 28,805 KB
Vuescan - 2620x1962 pix - developed Tiff 30,129 KB
It's not down to interpolation - the larger files really are showing a
bigger real image.
Not much in it but it is noticeable if you bother to look (which I never
have before).
Martyn Smoothy
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Winsor Crosby
Sent: 25 March 2006 08:09
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: E-1 cropped by photoshop
That is interesting. How much more? Seems like enough to notice would
be quite a lot.
I always get the number of pixels in Photoshop that the camera maker
says I should get. You get more in ACDSee?
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Mar 24, 2006, at 9:17 PM, Wayne S wrote:
> If I look at a raw E-1 photo with ACDSee 7.0, I see a bit more of
> the image around the edge than when I load into photoshop or
> when I view with Olympus Viewer. I have one photo where I wanted
> just those extra pixels, but it seems only ACDSee shows them??
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|