Amazing. Since the 65-200 shot is a little bit brighter I would assume
that the haze on the rear element is actually a light amplifier. Did
this come out of the secret Wyoming plant?
Chuck Norcutt
Walt Wayman wrote:
> We're having some work done on the back of our property -- much of it
> to my displeasure, which has resulted in some angry words and
> gestures, but that's a story for another day. An hour or so ago, I
> set up a tripod on the deck and fired off a series of shots with the
> E-1, 50-200DZ, and the old 65-200 Zuiko with the cloudy element, both
> at 200mm and f/8, aimed at an idle Bobcat parked down by the creek.
> Everything was shot RAW and each photograph had the exact same very
> minimal post processing. I'll let you reach your own conclusions.
>
> Full-frame establishing shot, made with the E-1 and 50-200DZ:
>
> http://home.att.net/~hiwayman/wsb/media/192375/site1099.jpg
>
> Crop of center portion of 50-200DZ shot:
>
> http://home.att.net/~hiwayman/wsb/media/192375/site1100.jpg
>
> Same crop of center portion of old, cloudy 65-200 Zuiko:
>
> http://home.att.net/~hiwayman/wsb/media/192375/site1101.jpg
>
> I'm not sure what to think about this. I do think, though, I need a
> nap before I think about it any more.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
