Subject: | [OM] Re: E-300 weird behaviour with Tamron 90/2.5 Type II - follow-up test |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:23:45 +1100 |
Jez, looks like the same effect. Great landscape image by the way. ...Wayne > Jez Cunningham <jez.cunningham@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Blow me down. I've seen artifacts like that on some of my pictures > (unrecorded lenses) and never known the reason - not a very good > example: > <http://users.pandora.be/cunninghams/photogallery/tuscany/pages/belvedere > %20in%20mist%2015-20.htm> > Jez > Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: E-300 weird behaviour with Tamron 90/2.5 Type II - follow-up test, Wayne Harridge |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: north/south carolina, Piers Hemy |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-300 weird behaviour with Tamron 90/2.5 Type II - follow-up test, Wayne Harridge |
Next by Thread: | [OM] A lens to supplement my 50mm/1.8 Zuiko, Philip Pemberton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |