Subject: | [OM] Re: E-300 weird behaviour with Tamron 90/2.5 Type II - follow-up test |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:20:31 +1100 |
Thanks Bob, Evidently film is not as reflective as the digital sensor, but I think that would explain your flare. ...Wayne > LostKase <lostkase2003@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Wayne, > It seems this happens on film also. I went back and looked at this > pick I had done awhile ago. I had always wondered where the flare came > from. > http://www.bellsouthpwp.net/l/o/lostkase/snub.jpg > This was done with a Tamron 90mm 2.5 49mm version. > Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: north/south carolina, Bob Whitmire |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: E-300 weird behaviour with Tamron 90/2.5 Type II - follow-up test, Wayne Harridge |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Erosion happens (Was: Re: e-1 over exposes when used with 1.4X and 50-200mm DZ), Walt Wayman |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-300 weird behaviour with Tamron 90/2.5 Type II - follow-up test, Wayne Harridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |