20D is cheaper, isn't it?
> >Nah. I think the D200 is a significantly better camera than either
>>one of them and there is very little difference in the resolution.
>>Check the review at dpreview of the D200.
>>
> Yes, I did, and I'm very interested in the D200 (couldn't handle one in a
> shop yet, though). This is why I was surprised at Tom saying that today he
> would choose a 20D or 5D. The 5D, I can understand. The 20D over the D200
> is more surprising to me. But I am still very uncertain about all this...
> The only thing I know is that I am very skeptical at the direction Oly
> seems to be taking ;-)
>
> Bernard
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|