[OM] Re: It's happened. I've relented.

[Tom Scales]

Perhaps, although I haven't read the reviews.  I think my prior points are 
valid though -- Canon is moving farther and faster.

Either one would be a good choice though.

Tom
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Winsor Crosby" <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 6:40 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: It's happened. I've relented.


>
> Nah. I think the D200 is a significantly better camera than either
> one of them and there is very little difference in the resolution.
> Check the review at dpreview of the D200.
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Bernard Frangoulis wrote:
>
>>
>> Do you mean "If I was starting digital today"? I think know you
>> choose the D100 back then, then the D2X. Would you choose the 20D/
>> 30D over the D200? Or the 5D over the D200?
>>
>> Bernard
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.1/279 - Release Date: 3/10/2006
>
> 


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================