But I note that he tends to a rather moody, darkly coloured look
which enjoys a certain softness in many most of his work - look at
the 'Fine Art' section which I assume is what he thinks is his best
work. I like the look of it but I get the impression that he's
working as an artist with a signature style which does not require
high resolution. Nice, nice work.
As I tend to shoot in single frames, one after another (look, shoot,
recompose, shoot) I usually can't be bloody bother to wait for RAW
myself. Too slow, too little benefit except for static shots.
AndrewF
(well known heretic - me and Dvorak are 'like that' [crosses fingers])
On 09/03/2006, at 3:30 PM, ScottGee1 wrote:
>
> Parker Pfister, a well known Canon shooter commits the ultimate
> heresies. Not only does he eschew RAW, he shoots his 1D II in the
> second highest JPG setting and makes excellent 20x30 prints in his own
> studio. See:
>
> http://www.pfisterphoto-art.com/22/
>
> ScottGee1
>
>
> On 3/8/06, Bill Pearce <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> There is also a faction that prefers SHQ to RAW, using the argument
>>> that a good photographer gets the exposure right, so RAW (and
>>> chimping) is unnecessary.
>>
>> My friend that is a Canon endorser shoots all SHQ, don't think he
>> even knows
>> about shooting RAW. He thinks it's better to take the chance than
>> have to
>> change cards so often.
>>
>> Bill Pearce
>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|