I dunno but I've seen is said several places... that it's MOS which is
NMOS. Perhaps it's a further development of something they called
vMAICOVICON back in 2004. They don't really say what it is except that
it ain't CCD nor CMOS... just something better.
<http://www.panasonic.co.jp/semicon/technology/e-presen14/micoe.pdf>
They were touting it for camera phones back then. Low voltage, low
power, greater proportion of surface area devoted to photo sensitive
area, simplified manufacturing process, readily scalable. Maybe it has
grown larger by now.
Chuck Norcutt
Andrew Fildes wrote:
> Are you sure of this. All the Oly stuff I've read simply dodges the
> issue by calling it LiveMOS. The people I get to talk to don't know
> the difference and don't really care. They just want to talk about
> the power requirements and the deep setting of each pixel reducing
> noise.
> What advantages would there be?
> AndrewF
>
>
> On 19/02/2006, at 4:14 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>
>>The E-330's sensor is actually NMOS and not CMOS.
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|