Subject: | [OM] Re: Nikon Scanner Advice |
---|---|
From: | AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:03:56 -0800 (PST) |
> I;m really surprised that a guy like you trusts your film to a > roller transport machine with weird chemistry and no flowing > water. Portra ALWAYS gets done by a REAL lab. The difference is night and day. However, I find that the low-end ISO 100/200 films from Fuji and Kodak seem to be optimized to this stew managed by minimum wage flunkies. The biggest problem with nearly all the one-hour lab setups is inadequate wash times. The base hasn't cleared enough. This is especially important with T400CN and XP2. AG __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: CD, DVD lives, July 2005, Jeff Keller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: #024 (OT gear), Moose |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Nikon Scanner Advice, Bill Pearce |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Nikon Scanner Advice, Bill Pearce |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |