Chris,
As compared to using my Zuikos to get these focal lengths, the color
rendering with the DZ 50-200 is more pleasing right out of the can,
certainly. Some marriage of the lens to the sensor? Maybe there is
something to the "designed for digital" thing. In any case, the AF can
be so nice, can't it? :)
Joel W.
On 2/5/06, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Coo lumme Joel!
> (old-fashioned Cockney expletive)
>
> It looks really good, at that size at least.
>
> It makes me want (need) the lens ;-), but I don't doubt that your
> technique and expertise are making the difference.
>
> Chris
> ~~ >-)-
> C M I Barker
> Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
> +44 (0)7092 251126
> www.threeshoes.co.uk
> homepage.mac.com/zuiko
>
>
> On 5 Feb 2006, at 19:00, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>
> > Am I giving you the impression that I really like this lens? :)
> >
> > For the noise police, I did pass the file through a mild solution of
> > Noise Community Edition.
> >
> > Here's another from the same event:
> >
> > http://myweb.uiowa.edu/jfwilcox/day/day53a.html
> >
> > Critical focus on the trombone. No PS or noise control on this one
> > Steadied myself by leaning into a support column in the room.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|