You probably don't see any noise difference because of in-camera noise
reduction. But the noise reduction removes fine detail which is why the
image looks softer.
Chuck Norcutt
Willie Wonka wrote:
> Finally, what took you so long to tell me what the noise difference
> is between the A1 and E1...:) I knew that when it comes to noise the
> cameras like the E-1 would exceed when it comes to noise, but my
> argument was not about cameras like it. The EVOLT is just as noisy
> as my A200, but I will admit that got this out of reading the tests
> others performed. A friend of mine bought long time ago the original
> Rebel. When he came to visit, we went to the Cliffwalk, which is a
> path on the Newport coast that gives you view of the mansions. By
> the time we were done it was dark. He does not know anything about
> picture taking and did not carry tripod and was disappointed when his
> camera "did not take the picture" of this mansion:
> http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/alienspecimen/detail?.dir=2b0d&.dnm=dc9are2.jpg&.src=ph
> So I offered some help and he got home with a pretty decent night
> picture...:) I still have that file on my computer at home and can't
> see any difference at 100% between the Rebel and the A200 during long
> exposures. One thing that I noticed though, is that the pictures
> from the A200 come out a little softer. As mentioned elswhere on the
> net, they sharpen pretty well and need more sharpening afterwards.
> Boris
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
