Subject: | [OM] Re: ZD 8mm fisheye |
---|---|
From: | Komtanoo Pinpimai <romerun@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:39:56 -0600 |
http://image.xitek.com/photo/200512/1393/139317/139317_1135703164.jpg http://image.xitek.com/photo/200512/1393/139317/139317_1135695236.jpg the center seems to be brighter and more colorful, are they photoshopped ? or the fisheye can produce these kinds of result ? -kem On 1/24/06, Dan Mitchell <danmitchell@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Bill Pearce wrote: > > Although I have a slight fondness for the 16mm, it's my experience that a > > fisheye is of very limited use if it is full frame, and almost no use if it > > isn't. > > I think it's just a matter of working out _how_ to use it -- here's > some portraits (which you'd think would be the hardest to get right) > with the ZD 8mm: > > http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=16856495 > > -- dan > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > -- do you know why MAC is no as fast as PC ? It's because the company doesn't focus only on computers or electronic equipments.They also sell burgers and fry. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Recent airline reviews?, Mike |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Olympus has some catching up to do, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: ZD 8mm fisheye, Dan Mitchell |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: ZD 8mm fisheye, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |