With chagrin, I have to agree. Been on the other side of the argument
a lot, but I like to shoot RAW, and I can no longer tolerate the wait
with a digicam. Still mighty good for jpgs, but I just don't need to
shoot other than RAW much, so why do it?
Joel W.
On 1/22/06, Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Not.
>
> That is kind of saying that a film Oly Stylus was as good as an OM4.
> Actually that was easier to say because at least the sensors were the
> same - 35mm film.
>
> Most of us with DSLRs on the list started with a digicam. None of us
> said, "Damn, I wish I had not done that." Haven't you read all the
> delirious comments of people with E-1s? Virtually all of them are
> comparing it to their previous digicam which for most of us sits
> there unused now.
snip
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Willie Wonka wrote:
>
> > IMHO, the cheap DSLR's are highly overrated, there are digicams
> > that are just as good...
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|