Yeah - you've already got the 'in person' side covered with those
'Annoying Silly Bastard Orders' have you not?
AndrewF
On 10/01/2006, at 7:51 PM, Jon Mitchell wrote:
>
> Or to look at it another way ....
>
> I can annoy someone in person as much as I like, but if I do it via
> the
> internet I get 2 years inside. Hmmm. That almost seems crackpot
> enough
> for our lot to take it up over here as well.
>
> Jon
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Andrew Fildes
> Sent: 10 January 2006 05:31
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: Don't be annoying!
>
>
> Just insist that you had no 'intent' to annoy.
> Maim, mutilate and psychologically damage, sure, but not 'annoy.'
> AndrewF
>
>
> On 10/01/2006, at 4:17 PM, Walt Wayman wrote:
>
>
>> Big Brother wants us all to be nice.
>>
>> http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%2C+go+to+jail/
>> 2010-1028_3-6022491.html
>>
>> I feel so much safer now.
>>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|