Well, there goes my digital blooming theory.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Jan 9, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Michael Wong wrote:
> Dear all,
> First thanks all who response my question.
>
> I am sorry that I only get *"digest" *so I cannot reply article by
> article.
>
> I'm glad that someone who point out my question. Maybe I mistake about
> chromatic aberration as Winsor said & thank you very much for Winsor's
> explanation.
>
> I took the picture with Fuji Superia 100 film & scanned by Nikon
> CoolScan IV
> ED. I wondered there is "purple fringing" around the roof at the
> edge of
> highlight area. I can find it even for my Zuiko 24mm F2 ~_~
> http://palmboy.palmcyber.net/gallery/albums/album125/IMG881.jpg
>
> Why I think there is chromatic aberration for the Tamron SP 17mm
> F3.5 since
> I cannot find same stitution for my Zuiko 90mm F2
> Marco ................
> http://palmboy.palmcyber.net/gallery/albums/album125/IMG879.jpg
>
>
> Unfortunately, my English is poor, I still cannot distinguish CA &
> digital
> bloom ................
>
> Anyway, thanks all to let me know what is "chromatic aberration" ^^
>
>
>
>
> Btw, I image another problem ................. there is no optical
> photo
> printing in HK & all changed to digital photo
> printing ............. means
> the photo will be scanned before printing ............. As Winsor
> said, how
> do I avoid the "purple fringing" for the photo?
>
>
>
> Michael
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|