Subject: | [OM] Re: cheap ebay radio slave, was: E-1 or E-300 |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:42:16 -0500 |
I'm not arguing for or against the e-300 (I still prefer to have both a hotshoe and PC connection) but a cheap ebay radio slave (I have 4 of them) will move the flash sync to the hotshoe and get rid of the PC cable. I use this same solution and sometimes have the transmitter working from the hotshoe and sometimes from the PC connector (comes with short PC cable) All 4 of mine are the battery powered model "YHDC-B" and the last two were purchased from this seller at small minimum bid + largish shipping cost. The total price is still low, however. <http://cgi.ebay.com/Wireless-Radio-Slave-Flashlight-4-Channel-battery_W0QQitemZ7578034061QQcategoryZ30086QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem> In some recent chatter on dpreview's forums on this subject someone commented that the AC powered receivers were more reliable than the battery powered ones. My battery powered ones have been reliable as long as they're used within their range limits. I have found them both quite variable between units and also quite directional with maximum range to the front and minimum to the rear. My longest range unit (hand picked and tested by the seller) reaches 150 feet to the front and about 80 feet to the rear. My shortest range unit reaches about 60 feet to the front and about 45 feet to the rear. Plenty for studio work and OK for other uses as long as you test each unit and use it within its capability. Caution: different model numbers (eg: "YHDC-A") are frequency incompatible. I've even heard from another owner that some with the same model number might be frequency incompatible. Best to buy all you will need in a single go. Chuck Norcutt Larry Powers wrote: > I am looking to jump into digital photography at a reasonable price. I have > found a 2 lens E-300 outfit for $600 that is appealing. For $750 I have > seen 2 lens E-1 outfits (includes the same lenses as the e-300). What are > the pros and cons between the 8 megapixel e-300 and 5 mega pixel e-1. I do > plan on shooting with studio flash so the the built in x sync on the e-1 is > appealing. > > > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Lightroom, ScottGee1 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: OT Met, was A little more Horn Pond, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-1 or E-300, AG Schnozz |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Lightroom, Chris Barker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |