OK, now I'm beginning to wonder if Michael meant to link to a
different image. Though this was obviously made with an ultra WA or
some sort . . .
ScottGee1
On 1/9/06, Ian Nichols <ian.a.nichols@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 09/01/06, Michael Wong <mialop.wong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> > I have gotten a Tamron SP 17mm F3.5 & found its' chromatic aberration is
> > serious.
> > http://palmboy.palmcyber.net/gallery/albums/album125/IMG877.jpg
> >
> > Is there any comment for this lens?
> >
>
> I find myself in agreement with the other commentators in this thread - I
> can's see any sign of worrying chromatic aberration. There may be a little
> teeny bit of colour fringing around some of the highlights, (which would be
> worse on the full-size image - I have to strain my eyes and use imagination
> to see it here) but that's to be expected since the highlights are daylight
> and the overall exposure is set to reveal detail in the covered area.
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
