Whew! Glad to hear I'm not the only one . . . maybe I'm more aberrant
than the CA and thus cannot perceive it. ;o)
ScottGee1
On 1/9/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sorry, I can't see it either.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Donald MacDonald wrote:
>
> >>On 1/9/06, Michael Wong <mialop.wong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>Dear all,
> >>I have gotten a Tamron SP 17mm F3.5 & found its' chromatic aberration is
> >>serious.
> >>http://palmboy.palmcyber.net/gallery/albums/album125/IMG877.jpg
> >>
> >>Is there any comment for this lens?
> >>
> >>
> >>Thank you very much^^
> >>
> >>
> >>Michael
> >>
> >
> >
> > Geez, I'm not seeing this at all. Do I need new glasses? What's not to like?
> >
> > This lens is well known as a 'keeper', and is on the cult lens list. I'd
> > certainly buy one, on this evidence.
> >
> > D.
> >
> >
> > ==============================================
> > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> > ==============================================
> >
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
