I honestly believe the 2000 is an under-rated body. It might be plasticky,
however it has
good feature's and cant be beat for the price.
On 8 Jan 2006 at 12:47, John Hermanson wrote:
The 200 is all Cosina with plastic top and bottom. Chassis is aluminum
I think.
___________________________________
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743
631-424-2121 | Olympus OM Service since 1977
www.zuiko.com | omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Remove 'spam' when writing
Jeff Keller wrote:
> The OM-2000 has more of a shine to it than the OM-3Ti. It is a pretty nice
> looking camera though. Plastic that looks like dark grey metal seems to be
> one of the more pleasing variations. As Jim(?) mentioned the OM-2000 has a
> very plastic feel to it though.
>
> -jeff
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Not having seen an OM-3Ti "in the flesh" myself it occurs to
> me that the finish on the Ti looks very similar to that on the OM-2000. Can
> anyone who has handled both confirm that ?
>
> ...Wayne
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: text/x-vcard
-- File: omtech1.vcf
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|