Subject: | [OM] OM-2000 was Re: Re: Your opinions on pricing for OM3 Ti |
---|---|
From: | "Jeff Keller" <jrk_om@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 08 Jan 2006 01:28:40 -0800 |
The OM-2000 has more of a shine to it than the OM-3Ti. It is a pretty nice looking camera though. Plastic that looks like dark grey metal seems to be one of the more pleasing variations. As Jim(?) mentioned the OM-2000 has a very plastic feel to it though. -jeff ----Original Message Follows---- From: "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Not having seen an OM-3Ti "in the flesh" myself it occurs to me that the finish on the Ti looks very similar to that on the OM-2000. Can anyone who has handled both confirm that ? ...Wayne ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: A couple of E-500 observations, Wayne Harridge |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: fragment of my day 1/7, Joel Wilcox |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Your opinions on pricing for OM3 Ti, Alexander Lecarme |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: OM-2000 was Re: Re: Your opinions on pricing for OM3 Ti, John Hermanson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |