I am sorry, but computer mags be they Mac or PC have no understanding
of photography at all and not much of digital photography. These
ratings are probably fine for those that pay attention to them, i.e.,
people who also don't understand photography. Which is not to say
that Olympus does not make fine cameras, but I can think of several
DSLRs that are superior to any on their list of "top 5".
Interestingly if you look at all their ratings a small HP digicam is
right up their with the Canon 20D and the Oly 7070 is superior to it.
Geez.
It is like those car mag comparisons with points awarded for tasteful
chrome strips on the outside.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Jan 2, 2006, at 10:58 AM, ScottGee1 wrote:
>
> Very interesting!
>
> I looked at the details behind the scores. The E-300 significantly
> outscores *everything* in the "Performance" category and the E-500
> does extremely well in the "Image Quality Tests" but I can't find an
> detailed explanation of the methodologies behind the tests and
> categories (other than "Image Quality"). They must use a weighted
> scoring system.
>
> Thanks for the link!
>
> ScottGee1
>
>
> On 1/2/06, oly-zooko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <oly-zooko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Happy New Year!!
>>
>> I am not sure if this is old news, however it certainly surprised me.
>>
>> http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,123929,00.asp
>>
>> Olympus ranks 1 & 2.
>>
>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|