Very interesting!
I looked at the details behind the scores. The E-300 significantly
outscores *everything* in the "Performance" category and the E-500
does extremely well in the "Image Quality Tests" but I can't find an
detailed explanation of the methodologies behind the tests and
categories (other than "Image Quality"). They must use a weighted
scoring system.
Thanks for the link!
ScottGee1
On 1/2/06, oly-zooko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <oly-zooko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Happy New Year!!
>
> I am not sure if this is old news, however it certainly surprised me.
>
> http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,123929,00.asp
>
> Olympus ranks 1 & 2.
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|