Hmmm. I didn't write that. But the OM is a beautiful series of things. I
like my digitals too, they're just different. /jmac
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of tOM Trottier
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 11:35 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: E-1 is rubbish I am going back to film
On 7 Dec 2005 at 16:23,
James N. McBride <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
> Ergonomically, the digitals are far worse than the OM's but they
> sure do make pictures a lot faster.
Nah, get that OM motor drive whirring at 5fps with a 250-
exposure back and a minute later, pick up your second body and
get that going while your assistant reloads....
tOM
---
-- Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur --
,__@ tOM Trottier, 758 Albert St,
_-\_<, Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
(*)/'(*) N45.412 W75.714 +1 613 860-6633
Abacurial Information Architecture
SETI stats
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|