Simon Worby wrote:
> Robert Swier wrote:
>>The 40-150 zoom is a much cheaper alternative. I'm just
>>wondering if anyone here has used it, and whether they
>>are pleased with the images it produces.
>
> I read somewhere (probably AP, but I can't remember) that it's very
> good. It's in the kit I'm considering.....
If you plough through the archives of the Olympus SLR forum on
www.dpreview.com, there's been a fair amount of sample images from that
lens and comparisons of it to the 50-200. To summarise (if I remember
correctly) the 40-150 is perfectly fine, but the 50-200 is great.
-- dan
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|