On Tuesday 06 December 2005 15:48, Robert Swier wrote:
> The 40-150 zoom is a much cheaper alternative. I'm just wondering if anyone
> here has used it, and whether they are pleased with the images it produces.
> Taking into account the multiplication factor, it's a longer lens than I
> would normally use. So, if the images are passable, it may be alright for a
> seldom-used lens.
I like it a lot, the images seem excellent: I think the lens is more than
"alright". Here's an image with lots of detail at 100mm, f/4 (max. aperture)
(handheld on e-300):
http://parzival.smugmug.com/photos/46316378-D.jpg
Warning: large file
--
Parzival Herzog
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
