John Nelson wrote:
>>I have a 50/1.4 lens of that vintage which is fine, but I wouldn't have
>>
>>
>accepted a similar purchase from a seller; the difference between lenses is,
>I understand, significant.<
>
>I recently acquired via eB*y a 50mm f1.4 with the serial number 1152298. I'm
>very pleased with it, but didn't realise these were several versions.
>Presumably this one is quite late?
>
>We only ask because we want to know . . .
>
>
Yes, this is an example of the last version. They started with about
serial 1,085,000.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|