USHER99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>Hi,
>Purchased what I had expected to be the sharpest ver of this lens from the
>Bay---2nd purchase. The sn pictured was 1,150,XXX or so and I received
>758,XXX.
> It is in mint condition with clean glass etc.--possibly slightly better
>condition than the lens pictured. It has GZuiko printed on the front ring. I
>would guess it is the SC version as there is no designation to the contrary.
>I
>paid approx. $50.00 which might be a bit much for an SC version. I contacted
>the seller-no response as of yet. Given the highish sn, could this lens be
>quite a good ver? I'm inclined to send it back, as I don't really collect
>lenses
>I don't wish to use often, though I haven't yet met a lens I didn't like.
>
>
Downside: It isn't what you bought. It is two versions earlier, at
least. It isn't worth $50.
Upside: It's in your hands, It's a good lens in mint condition. Returns
are a hassle. It's not worth that much less than $50.
You know the options...
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|