Mike
I have a 50/1.4 lens of that vintage which is fine, but I wouldn't
have accepted a similar purchase from a seller; the difference
between lenses is, I understand, significant.
More to the point is that you have not been sent what you were
bidding on and I suggest that you return it to the seller.
Chris
~~ >-)-
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
www.threeshoes.co.uk
homepage.mac.com/zuiko
On 27 Nov 2005, at 04:06, USHER99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi,
> Purchased what I had expected to be the sharpest ver of this lens
> from the
> Bay---2nd purchase. The sn pictured was 1,150,XXX or so and I
> received 758,XXX.
> It is in mint condition with clean glass etc.--possibly slightly
> better
> condition than the lens pictured. It has GZuiko printed on the
> front ring. I
> would guess it is the SC version as there is no designation to the
> contrary. I
> paid approx. $50.00 which might be a bit much for an SC version. I
> contacted
> the seller-no response as of yet. Given the highish sn, could this
> lens be
> quite a good ver? I'm inclined to send it back, as I don't really
> collect lenses
> I don't wish to use often, though I haven't yet met a lens I didn't
> like.
> Mike
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|