Umm? You think all the photos are in focus. Depends on the photog! 8-))
ScottGee1 wrote:
>Hey! Why do you need a "good" VF anyway? AF is perfect so all the
>pix are in focus anyway!
>
>Besides, it saves the manufacturers money so they can sell the cams to
>us for lower prices.
>
>Fussy, fussy, fussy . . . :-?
>
>ScottGee1
>
>
>On 10/26/05, Geilfuss Charles <Charles.Geilfuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>>Ali,
>> Won't know until the E-500 is in hand. I have compared the E-300 and
>> R*bel XT side by side and I thought the viewfinders were comparable. If
>> Dpreview is to be believed then the E-500 has a dimmer viewfinder than the
>> E-300. Askey seemed pretty disappointed in the finder in what he thought was
>> otherwise a very good camera.
>>
>>Charlie
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
>>Behalf Of Ali
>>Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 10:41 PM
>>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [OM] Re: Shots again the E-500
>>
>>
>>
>>I checked out a Can*n Rebel XT at Office Max the other day. The
>>viewfinder is certainly smaller than let's say an OM-2N. Is the E-500
>>viewfinder going much smaller than the Rebel XT?
>>
>>- Ali
>>
>>==============================================
>>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>==============================================
>>==============================================
>>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>==============================================
>>
>>
>>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|