Subject: | [OM] Re: Shots again the E-500 |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:54:06 +1000 |
> Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > More than not a priority, which is indeed true, it is also an optical > impossiblity on the 4/3 and APS sized sensors. > I believe the trade-off is small & bright vs large & dim. ...Wayne Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Is this true?, Andrew McPhee |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Is this true?, Chris Barker |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Idle thoughts from an addled mind, NSURIT |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Shots again the E-500, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |