Well, the price of Bronica 100-220 zoom is much lower than I remember in the
old days. The weight of Bronica SQ-A is not really that much more than ETRS,
I used to carry one body with three lenses (50, 80, 150), speed grip and
prism finder in a small Rowi bag. Consider the small number of shoot I made,
12 vs 15 doesn't make much a different. On the other hand the 6x7 is really
a monster. I won't consider high magnification marco a benefit for MF, you
can never have the flexibility of 35mm system and now of course it is the
job of digital. To me MF is mainly for landscape and portrait, for its high
resolution and fine grain.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: <jking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>
> The bronica 100-220 from keh in EX condition is not that much! including
> shipping and vat and duty worked out at 511 pounds. (111 pounds of that
> being vat and duty)
> I don't think I could buy much in the way of second hand zeiss wides for
> that!
> The advantage I can see to the square format is that you effectively have
> some shift built in so that you don't have to angle the camera up or down
> to much. But the downsides are weight, extra cost and less shoots on a
> roll. Ideally I would have gone for 6x7 but the weight, bulk, no 1:1 macro
> and lack of telephoto zoom put me off.
>
> James
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|