Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: More Dynamic Range

Subject: [OM] Re: More Dynamic Range
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:02:32 -0700
I have used both auto color and color matching with mixed success.  
Sometimes they work perfectly, sometimes they get close enough to do  
a small eyeball tweak to get what you want and sometimes you end up  
with something that looks like it was taken on an alien world.

Since learning that 90 percent color balance technique I hardly ever  
bother with them though. It is almost always spot on.

http://www.photoworkshop.com/registered/softwarecinema/Eddie_Tapp/ 
index2.html




Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA




On Oct 17, 2005, at 9:22 AM, Andrew Dacey wrote:

> Sounds like you're better off with using layers and masking parts
> then. I find that some of the automatic tools are great but they tend
> to be somewhat limited. For instance, I've had great sucess with the
> colour match command when working with very similar shots (such as
> comparing subtley different studio shots) but then had horrible
> results with other things that I would think *should* be do-able.
>
> For instance, I recently did some layout work for the invitations to
> my cousin's BFA graduation show. The invites were on postcards and
> included 1 full length shot of one of her pieces and then 4 detail
> shots. One of the detail shots had a lot of the backdrop in it (which
> I later cropped out) so it was easily matched with the full length
> shot. For the other 3 shots though it was utterly useless. Even when I
> used selections to select areas that were identical colors in the 2
> shots I couldn't get it to match. For some reason I could get a great
> match in that selection area but if I told it to do the matching on
> the whole image then the colour would get messed up, even in the
> selection area that was matching great before.
>
> The way it *seems* it's supposed to work is that you can select areas
> in each image that should be the same color and then have it apply
> those corrections to the whole image but for some reason it completely
> fouls up the image. I'm using CS not CS2 so maybe it's been improved.
>
> Still, for a couple of things it's been a life-saver. I had 1 image
> that I'd put a lot of time in on (a lot of dust and scratches) but
> then somehow the colour profile got messed up so the colours looked
> awful. I still had the original scan which had the colour I wanted and
> was able to use colour match to get the cleaned up scan back to the
> colour I wanted.
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz