Subject: | [OM] Re: DIGITAL ZUIKO 50/2, is good for portrait? |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Dacey <adacey@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 5 Oct 2005 13:59:37 -0300 |
On 10/5/05, ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hmmm . . . I'm at work and it's probably bad enough that I'm accessing > personal email, but now I'm *really* afraid to follow this link . . . The content of the picture shouldn't be something that'd get you in trouble at work. Now the action of viewing the content might but that's a separate issue. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: DIGITAL ZUIKO 50/2, is good for portrait?, ScottGee1 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: RARE OLYMPUS OM ZUIKO AUTO-T 135mm f2.8 LENS 7551778510 C $112.57 BIN in UK, Piers Hemy |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: DIGITAL ZUIKO 50/2, is good for portrait?, ScottGee1 |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: DIGITAL ZUIKO 50/2, is good for portrait?, Andrew Dacey |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |