I'm with Walt!
Bill Pearce
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 11:37 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: DIGITAL ZUIKO 50/2, is good for portrait?
> There's a background? Guess I need to look again. Couldn't get past the
> gorgeous foreground.
>
> Walt
>
> --
> "Anything more than 500 yards from
> the car just isn't photogenic." --
> Edward Weston
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: Andrew Dacey <adacey@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> On 10/5/05, David Irisarri <div2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > SORRY HERE IT´S THE LINK
>> >
>> > http://www.myfourthirds.com/document.php?id=15525
>>
>> Personally, there's something about the distracting background that
>> bothers me. I'm not sure if it's that I'd like to see it a bit more
>> blurred (such as if the lens could open to 1.4) or if it's the quality
>> of the bokeh that's bothering me. Fortunately, the distracting
>> foreground MORE than makes up for it :-). I really like the separation
>> of her from the background while still having her seem to be part of
>> the scene.
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|