Yes, that's better. But it's still not a great background. The lens
can't fix that.
Joel W.
On 9/25/05, iddi <iddibhai@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:22:47 -0700, Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'd say it's not so much bad bokeh as a "poor bokeh subject." I don't
> > think you can make that kind of background look smooth unless you
> > manage to get an even smaller stop. Maybe.
>
> I would have thought smaller aperture = worse. that shot (e10bb.jpg) was
> @f/4, below is f/2.8 (forgot to keep it wide open)
>
> http://users2.ev1.net/~wesiddiquis/e10bb2.jpg
>
> and it looks better, I'd think.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
