Jeff:
Do you mean that you cannot physically mount the 1.4XA on the lens, or
you don't have one to mount? On the couple of Tamrons that I have, the
Adaptall mount usually provides sufficent space between the rear lens
and the mount.
Martin
Jeff Keller wrote:
>It's not too late, repent Dan ...
>
>The Tamron 80-200/2.8 is my favorite telephoto zoom. If I could put a 1.4x
>Olympus converter on it, I would seldom leave it home. When I want a longer
>focal length, I carry the petite Zuiko 50-250/5 and generally a big Tamron.
>Too bad all those good pictures you're taking confused you into thinking
>that the 1DMII could replace your OMs.
>
>When you discover the truth you'll regret selling your 80-200/2.8.
>
>I saw that you got the Zuiko 18 (congratulations). Doesn't the new improved
>prices for C*non users make you want to go back to OM days?
>
>-jeff
>(I also still like the Tamron 35-105/2.8 but it is has very stiff
>competition with the Zuiko 35-80/2.8)
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: danrich7
>>
>>Hello Jeff my friend!
>>Wow what a bunch of die hards there are here, I love it!
>>
>>You suggested the Tamron 35-70 and 80-200 years ago and there
>>still amazing!
>>
>>It was a fast test and the Tamron did admirably!
>>
>>I have a Zuiko 21 f/2 and an 18 3.5 on the way to me this week!
>>Can't wait to test them on my Canon 1DMK2 When I put them on
>>my OM 2n I laugh with joy how wide they are on a one to one
>>view finder.
>>The view finder on the old OM's are so big compared to the
>>modern digitals.
>>Daniel Danrich
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|