Hi Andrew,
> Should you manage to get the 90/2 unglued from your
> OM-4Ti (real shame there, what type of adhesive did you use?) I'd
> highly recommend it as a small lightweight contender for that focal
> length. Having not used the 90/2 I can't say how it compares.
I'm using post-it note type of adhesive. It's sticky, but not too much so.
I've only held a 85/f2.0 once in my life, that's when I bought one at a
really low price in a neighbourhood shop & traded it in for a discount
on the OM-4Ti + 90mm/f2.0 + 50mm/f1.4. Earned me about 10 euro. I'd
already fallen in love with the 90mm/f2.0 before that, after seeing
photos taken with it on the Internet, so I considered the 85 only as a
way of making a quick buck. I guess I didn't do it justice, considering
the good stories I heard about it afterwards. The 90mm is heavy, but I
find that it gives a reassuring weight to the camera. That's an extra
reason why the 50mm/f1.4 needed some getting used to: it's so light ! :-)
Related to what I used the 50mm/f1.4 for: does anybody know how to scan
a photo book ? I'm making one for that wedding I shot, and I'd like to
show it on the Internet (instead of showing single shots).
--
Peter Leyssens
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|