Depth of field?? There isn't any - leastwise none that I have seen on the
20/3.5!
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Duncan Paterson
Sent: 30 August 2005 23:12
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: OM macro lenses?
Hi Dean,
Which focusing screen do you find most suitable to use with the 38/2.8? Does
the 1-12 screen offer an advantage? I've found that with lots of lens
extension, focusing can be tricky with a 2-series but I've never had the
chance to try a clear screen like the 1-12 so I can't compare the two. I
imagine that having no impression of depth of field can also be tricky.
Cheers,
Duncan.
--- "Dean C. Hansen" <hanse112@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I use the 38/2.8 extensively to photograph insects and jumping
> spiders. "Indispensable" is not too strong an adjective to describe
> this wonderful lens. If you're interested in photographing things a
> few to several millimeters long, get this lens.
<snip>
> The 38/2.8 will be getting a real workout.
> Best wishes,
> Dean
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE
with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|