Yes, sure,
I have tried 5000k, as recommended from some, but on the Lacie, it gave
a too strong magenta cast.
I tried to get used to it, but in the end i gave up.
I currently use 6360K and am very happy with it.
I'm considering upgrading to an LCD, since the phosphors on the LACIE
are starting to show their age.
Any suggestion?
Alfredo
On Aug 25, 2005, at 6:17 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>
> If you use Silverfast with calibration target that is completely
> different
> issue, it may work very well. My EIZO LCD is set to 5000K. Anyway,
> since the
> computer image and slide are under the same color temp., the comparison
> should be valid.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "alfredo pagliano" <alfredo_pag@xxxxxxxx>
>
>>
>> I agree, the Nikons Scanner are best in this category.
>>
>> But the Minolta performed very well as regard to color accuracy.
>>
>> My mac's Lacie is calibrated using an Eye-one, of course comparation
>> was made looking at the slide at 5500K.
>>
>> I used Silverfast, together with it's own calibration Target.
>>
>> This is one of twelwe images I delivered for a calendar on Ossolan
>> Churches.
>>
>> Alfredo
>>
>> Regarding to opening a window on Your monitor, what Color temperature
>> is it set to?
>>
>> Usually a monitor set for printing works at 6500K, and this would not
>> be good for viewing slides on it.
>>
>> Alfredo
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|