You have no idea how difficult to get the right color if it is not right at
the beginning. Being a film scanner users since the N*kon LS-10 in 1993 I
know it very well. Same for the DSLR, all errors (I mean color) can be
adjusted then why you need one with good color rendering?
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "alfredo pagliano" <alfredo_pag@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Saturation can be treated with postprocessing, anyway
>
> Alfredo
>
> On Aug 25, 2005, at 5:08 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi James,
>>
>> I found your review short but vey clear, for the color it is same as my
>> experience and also my friend who owned the M*nolta scanner. I had
>> tried a
>> Scan Speed (the 2800dpi M*nolta top of the line at that time) for two
>> weeks,
>> the color was not as accurate and under saturated for both slide and
>> negative (with original software). At that time the resoluton of
>> M*nolta was
>> better than my N*kon LS2000 but the color of LS2000 was much more
>> accurate
>> (for slide).
>>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|