I agree with You Ling, the 17-40 is, to the best of my knowledge the
best wideangle zoom C*n*n produces.
I was talking referring to Zoom lenses in general, their longer focals
are quite very good.
Alfredo
On Aug 25, 2005, at 1:21 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>
> I'm sure the final print will not be better and of course if you view
> it
> from distance you may not see it. I'm intereted to know which is the
> best
> superwide zoom from C*non. All I see and heard the 17-40/4 is the best
> from
> them, I also had one in the past. Actually, they only have the
> 16-35/2.8 to
> compare, it is not as good and the older 17-35 is even poorer.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "alfredo pagliano" <alfredo_pag@xxxxxxxx>
>
>>
>> RAW Developer and C1 are much better in this regard.
>>
>> Anyway it's difficult judge a compressed jpeg image.
>>
>> And I'm not sure this would show on the final print.
>>
>> Sure, in my opinion, the 17-40 it's not one of best C*n*n zooms.
>>
>> Alfredo
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|