mmmhhh....
In my opinion they conservatively choose a low sharpening level to
minimize noise in the sky (which is already visible especially in the
lower transition area) and chromatic aberration, (a hint of which is
visible on the mountain line on the left with the cloud behind)
Having used RAW image task (they write it in the image description),
with my now gone 350D shots, I can honestly say that the program uses
relatively poor sharpening alghoritms.
RAW Developer and C1 are much better in this regard.
Anyway it's difficult judge a compressed jpeg image.
And I'm not sure this would show on the final print.
Sure, in my opinion, the 17-40 it's not one of best C*n*n zooms.
Alfredo
On Aug 24, 2005, at 3:01 PM, NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 8/24/2005 7:48:42 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> Pschings@xxxxxxx writes:
>
> http://web.canon.jp/Imaging/eos5d/eos5d_sample-e.html
>
> Has anyone looked at these? What's up with the corners on the
> landscape
> shot?
>
>
>
>
>
> They look pretty soft to me. Bill Barber
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|